How different candidates performed?

Give the information regarding how much votes each candidate received?

In the given graph the candidate who was the most successful was DEM who won two times . he got the most  votes both in challenger and incumbent but he lacked behind in open. In incumbent DEM got around 300 million votes followed by REP who got around 270 million votes in the Challenger section. All the other candidates like AIP, NPA, TX were under 5 million votes. NNE was the fourth most successful candidate who got around 10 million votes but these votes were nothing as we compare it with those three like DEM,REP. DFl also preformed well as compared with the minor ones like GRE,GRN,CST who didn’t even performed in the votes . Their performance was about to neglegible in the votes because we cannot see their performance in the graph.overall DEM was at peak position, followed by the REP and at third was the NNE in all the three sections like open, challanger and incumbent.

Which segment acquired most percentage?

The segment which was at peak was the incumbent which acquired around 45% of the total percentage.at 2^nd the segment was challenger which acquired about 30 percent of the total proportion. At last the area was of the openers who acquired around 25 percent of the total grade. The reason behind the success of the incumbent was that the successful parties performed very well in this area because the DEM got around 300 million votes and REP got around 180 million votes in this section. The reason behind the success of the challenger was because of the success of the REP who got 270 million votes in this section. At last was the open section. In this section REP and DEM performed well as compared with the others. But these candidates only got 150 million and 100 million votes respectively. Third candidate was NNE who got only 10 million votes but all these candidates performed in very less proportion. That was the reason that why open section left behind from others.

Who contributed by how much amount?

In the given graph the section which contributed most was the incumbent section which alone contributed around $490000000. It was followed by the challenger section which contributed around $325000000. At last open section acquired around $275000000.furthermore the individual itemized contribution between the challenger and incumbent was around $300000000. But in between the incumbent the contribution was around $300000000 but this proportion was thicker than it was between the challenge section and the incumbent section. The individual contribution was greater in the three sections like Challenger, incumbent and open. But  the individual itemized contribution was less as compared to the individual contribution. The individual contribution is represented in blue and the individual itemized contribution is represented in the red.

Who is at highest individual contribution among Challenger, Incumbent and Open?

Incumbent is at highest at approximately 500 million and leading ahead of the rest in terms of individual contribution. Challenger is at lowest among all three at 85 million (approximately). Open is ahead of Challenger and it at 110 million, but it is lower than Incumbent by 390 million.

Who is leading among all three: Challenger, Incumbent and Open?

Incumbent is leading all and is at 500 million for individual contribution. Challenger is at about 350 million after Incumbent. Furthermore, Open is at last and counts below 300 million. Overall, Incumbent is at first, Challenger is at second and Open is at third position among individual contribution.